
Via: Conceptcarz
 
 Gottlieb Daimler and Wilhelm Maybach, 1885-6:  At the same tim that Benz was finishing off his Motorwagen, Maybach and Daimler were putting the finishing touches on the engine that would make the motorcar more a practical concern and less a novelty.  The fact that the work of these two men went on separate from, and without detailed knowledge of the work of Benz, and the broader application of their work (they created the first motorcycle, and were the first to use four wheels on an gas-powered vehicle, they also were the first to apply their new engine to marine craft).
Gottlieb Daimler and Wilhelm Maybach, 1885-6:  At the same tim that Benz was finishing off his Motorwagen, Maybach and Daimler were putting the finishing touches on the engine that would make the motorcar more a practical concern and less a novelty.  The fact that the work of these two men went on separate from, and without detailed knowledge of the work of Benz, and the broader application of their work (they created the first motorcycle, and were the first to use four wheels on an gas-powered vehicle, they also were the first to apply their new engine to marine craft). Nicholas-Joseph Cugnot, 1769:  This gentleman almost certainly created the first self-propelled vehicle that did not require a fabricated running surface (a track in other words).  Cugnot's fardier à vapeur (Roughly:  "Steam Wagon") was designed at the behest of Louis XV of France to carry heavy artillery pieces (incidentally, in may have also been involved in the first car crash when it went out of control and smashed into the wall of an Arsenal), but was abandoned due to poor performance.  If though, an automobile is defined as a vehicle that is able to run without a prepared track, carries its own power source and some fuel, is able to carry a load other than that required to power it, and can be controlled from within (and I think that's a pretty good definition), then this is really where it first came together.
Nicholas-Joseph Cugnot, 1769:  This gentleman almost certainly created the first self-propelled vehicle that did not require a fabricated running surface (a track in other words).  Cugnot's fardier à vapeur (Roughly:  "Steam Wagon") was designed at the behest of Louis XV of France to carry heavy artillery pieces (incidentally, in may have also been involved in the first car crash when it went out of control and smashed into the wall of an Arsenal), but was abandoned due to poor performance.  If though, an automobile is defined as a vehicle that is able to run without a prepared track, carries its own power source and some fuel, is able to carry a load other than that required to power it, and can be controlled from within (and I think that's a pretty good definition), then this is really where it first came together. Ferdinand Verbiest, 1672:  Bit of a mystery here, and there's some debate as to whether it was ever built.  Even if it was, it doesn't satisfy all the requirements of being an automobile because it almost certainly couldn't have been ridden, or controlled.  Still, this Jesuit monk at least created a design for what, if it was indeed built, would have been a very early example of a self propelled vehicle.  I for one find this sketch somehow darling with its modified Hero's Engine concept driving an impeller.  It's the first turbine car!
Ferdinand Verbiest, 1672:  Bit of a mystery here, and there's some debate as to whether it was ever built.  Even if it was, it doesn't satisfy all the requirements of being an automobile because it almost certainly couldn't have been ridden, or controlled.  Still, this Jesuit monk at least created a design for what, if it was indeed built, would have been a very early example of a self propelled vehicle.  I for one find this sketch somehow darling with its modified Hero's Engine concept driving an impeller.  It's the first turbine car!   A very cool Saturday this week, with the members of the local Alfa Romeo club bringing out their cars, and several other cool cars besides.  I have to confess to first borrowing my friend Justin's camera for the day, then forgetting to bring it, so it's the same lousy phone-pics we usually get.  I know, I suck.  Still there's a good number of pics, and some really cool cars.  The day was capped off for me by a ride in the very same Daytona from last week's pics.  Hat-tip to my new best friend Marty for taking me on the ride of the year, even after the H2 nudged off one of the Ferrari's bumper "eyebrows."  I am wondering how I managed to keep from photographing any of the GTVs at the store, but oh well...  Sorry this installment is a bit late (as if people were waiting for it), but it was my birthday on Monday, and I've been distracted.  Here we go then.
A very cool Saturday this week, with the members of the local Alfa Romeo club bringing out their cars, and several other cool cars besides.  I have to confess to first borrowing my friend Justin's camera for the day, then forgetting to bring it, so it's the same lousy phone-pics we usually get.  I know, I suck.  Still there's a good number of pics, and some really cool cars.  The day was capped off for me by a ride in the very same Daytona from last week's pics.  Hat-tip to my new best friend Marty for taking me on the ride of the year, even after the H2 nudged off one of the Ferrari's bumper "eyebrows."  I am wondering how I managed to keep from photographing any of the GTVs at the store, but oh well...  Sorry this installment is a bit late (as if people were waiting for it), but it was my birthday on Monday, and I've been distracted.  Here we go then.














 Well!  That was a blast commuting last week in the Alfa Romeo SS.  It's light weight and tiny, high revving engine made it agile in traffic, and exciting to drive, if a little manic.  This week though we're going in a different direction because, it's stopped raining in SoCal, and isn't set to start again for the rest of the week!  Yes, we're excited too.  In fact, it's set to be a banner week of sunny days and cool breezes; so what better week to indulge in the joys of a small roadster?
Well!  That was a blast commuting last week in the Alfa Romeo SS.  It's light weight and tiny, high revving engine made it agile in traffic, and exciting to drive, if a little manic.  This week though we're going in a different direction because, it's stopped raining in SoCal, and isn't set to start again for the rest of the week!  Yes, we're excited too.  In fact, it's set to be a banner week of sunny days and cool breezes; so what better week to indulge in the joys of a small roadster?
 Ok, it's not fast, not at all.  In fact, this is the slowest of the Alpines, which is saying something.  The 1494cc, OHV four cylinder gives a 0-60mph time of around 14 seconds, and it will struggle to break the ton even with a tailwind.  We think it looks great though, with its down-draft Strombergs and seperate header tank. To address some of the performance issues, we're thinking about fitting the engine upgrade kit and suspension pieces from the faster, more powerful Harrington Alpine coupes, which should help with getting on.  An overdrive gearbox would be a nice addition too, and help keep the fuel milage in the 30s.
Ok, it's not fast, not at all.  In fact, this is the slowest of the Alpines, which is saying something.  The 1494cc, OHV four cylinder gives a 0-60mph time of around 14 seconds, and it will struggle to break the ton even with a tailwind.  We think it looks great though, with its down-draft Strombergs and seperate header tank. To address some of the performance issues, we're thinking about fitting the engine upgrade kit and suspension pieces from the faster, more powerful Harrington Alpine coupes, which should help with getting on.  An overdrive gearbox would be a nice addition too, and help keep the fuel milage in the 30s. We're going to go ahead and wish for one of the removable hard-tops, in body color.  It's a nice piece to have for any roadster, and that of early Alpines is one of the nicest looking, doing nothing to spoil the attractiveness of the lines.  In fact, with the hard-top in place the Alpine takes on the aspect of a miniature Maserati 3500 GT, well, if you squint a bit anyway...  Of course, it also carries the benefit of turning the little Sunbeam into a snug coupe, should the weather man turn out to be less than accurate.  Along the same, comfort oriented line, we're going to want the Micorcell seats that were an option on the Harrington cars.  Wire wheels should be all that's needed to get the exterior in line aesthetically.
We're going to go ahead and wish for one of the removable hard-tops, in body color.  It's a nice piece to have for any roadster, and that of early Alpines is one of the nicest looking, doing nothing to spoil the attractiveness of the lines.  In fact, with the hard-top in place the Alpine takes on the aspect of a miniature Maserati 3500 GT, well, if you squint a bit anyway...  Of course, it also carries the benefit of turning the little Sunbeam into a snug coupe, should the weather man turn out to be less than accurate.  Along the same, comfort oriented line, we're going to want the Micorcell seats that were an option on the Harrington cars.  Wire wheels should be all that's needed to get the exterior in line aesthetically. The rest of the car is pretty conventional, with control arms holding the front off the ground while the rear has a live axle on Semi-elliptic leaf-springs.  It does feature unit construction though, which we weren't totally expecting, as well as front disk brakes.  Really, the car is more about comfort than it is about speed or even handling.  It'll offer a nice ride on the freeway, but still acquit itself well on twisting roads because it will be lighter to drive than an MGA or TR-3.  We're looking forward to early morning commutes, top down with the heater on and the side windows rolled up.
The rest of the car is pretty conventional, with control arms holding the front off the ground while the rear has a live axle on Semi-elliptic leaf-springs.  It does feature unit construction though, which we weren't totally expecting, as well as front disk brakes.  Really, the car is more about comfort than it is about speed or even handling.  It'll offer a nice ride on the freeway, but still acquit itself well on twisting roads because it will be lighter to drive than an MGA or TR-3.  We're looking forward to early morning commutes, top down with the heater on and the side windows rolled up. So that's this week's choice.  It's a long-shot in a lot of ways, but it's a good, unusual roadster that combines comfort and style like few others.  There's even the matter of a true folding roof that drops completely out of sight behind a clever cover system that also forms the rear seat-back.  Not that you'd ever think of using the rear seat for anything besides your jacket or shopping.
So that's this week's choice.  It's a long-shot in a lot of ways, but it's a good, unusual roadster that combines comfort and style like few others.  There's even the matter of a true folding roof that drops completely out of sight behind a clever cover system that also forms the rear seat-back.  Not that you'd ever think of using the rear seat for anything besides your jacket or shopping.
 You might be able to tell from a couple posts lately, that I've been watching a fair amount of Le Mans retrospectives on the Youtube.  I love GT and endurance racing, and Group C and GT1 are two of my favorite classes of racing car.  I love the way these low drag, high down-force cars seem to sweep effortlessly through corners, and the sheer functionality of their lines.  I especially love the way GT1 cars try to rationalize the need for brutal aerodynamics with some semblance of road car styling.  Top level racing at Le Mans has lost a bit of luster in recent years -though the lower classes have come in to their own in a way that hasn't been seen in decades- because of ever tightening rules and a string of wins by one brand.  But ten years ago, the Circuit de la Sarthe hosted some of the most exciting racing around, much better than the procession that was F1 at the time.  Like all racing, Le Mans has had its historic ups and downs, and I'm hopeful that we're just at the end of one of the slumps, what with Peugeot's 908 HDi finally giving Audi a run for their money.
You might be able to tell from a couple posts lately, that I've been watching a fair amount of Le Mans retrospectives on the Youtube.  I love GT and endurance racing, and Group C and GT1 are two of my favorite classes of racing car.  I love the way these low drag, high down-force cars seem to sweep effortlessly through corners, and the sheer functionality of their lines.  I especially love the way GT1 cars try to rationalize the need for brutal aerodynamics with some semblance of road car styling.  Top level racing at Le Mans has lost a bit of luster in recent years -though the lower classes have come in to their own in a way that hasn't been seen in decades- because of ever tightening rules and a string of wins by one brand.  But ten years ago, the Circuit de la Sarthe hosted some of the most exciting racing around, much better than the procession that was F1 at the time.  Like all racing, Le Mans has had its historic ups and downs, and I'm hopeful that we're just at the end of one of the slumps, what with Peugeot's 908 HDi finally giving Audi a run for their money. Well, we're off to a pretty good start here.  Not only is the GT-6 a great little classic in its own right, it also has an inline-six cylinder motor, just like so many 50s Le Mans racers from Jaguar and Aston Martin.  Go for the MkII version (GT-6+ in the US) and you'll replace the Herald-based swing-axles at the rear end with lower wishbones and trailing arms, so it won't kill you.
Well, we're off to a pretty good start here.  Not only is the GT-6 a great little classic in its own right, it also has an inline-six cylinder motor, just like so many 50s Le Mans racers from Jaguar and Aston Martin.  Go for the MkII version (GT-6+ in the US) and you'll replace the Herald-based swing-axles at the rear end with lower wishbones and trailing arms, so it won't kill you.   Prices for these things are all over the map at present.  Last year the 240 wouldn't have made the list at all as most good cars were running at an incredibly overvalued $15-20,000.  Someone seems to have noticed that 240Zs are neither very rare, nor hard to restore, and so the middle of the market has come down a bit, as has the bottom, with only show-quality cars running big money at the moment.
  Prices for these things are all over the map at present.  Last year the 240 wouldn't have made the list at all as most good cars were running at an incredibly overvalued $15-20,000.  Someone seems to have noticed that 240Zs are neither very rare, nor hard to restore, and so the middle of the market has come down a bit, as has the bottom, with only show-quality cars running big money at the moment.   In best Porsche tradition, the 914 isn't just related to cars that raced at Le Mans, it actually raced there and acquitted itself well, finishing 6th overall and 1st in the GT category at the same race won overall by Porsche's 917 (it was a good weekend for the company).  That of course was the 914/6 GT version, but even the lowliest 914 retain much of what made that car a winner including the mid-ship mounting of the engine -Volkswagen 411 sourced in 4 cylinder cars, an all-disk braking system, and four-wheel independent suspension.  The gearbox is a five-speed.
In best Porsche tradition, the 914 isn't just related to cars that raced at Le Mans, it actually raced there and acquitted itself well, finishing 6th overall and 1st in the GT category at the same race won overall by Porsche's 917 (it was a good weekend for the company).  That of course was the 914/6 GT version, but even the lowliest 914 retain much of what made that car a winner including the mid-ship mounting of the engine -Volkswagen 411 sourced in 4 cylinder cars, an all-disk braking system, and four-wheel independent suspension.  The gearbox is a five-speed.   All right, we're now squarely into the mid-engine era, both at Sarthe and on the road.  So you're looking for a bit of that Alfa 33/Ferrari P4 sensation for the street?  Look no further, this is where it starts.  Bertone gave real sports car styling to their replacement for the 850 Spider, and the idea of placing the Fiat 128's driveline behind the seats gave impressive handling.  The X1/9 sports struts and disk brakes at all four corners and a 1.3 liter SOHC engine attached to a four-speed gearbox.
  All right, we're now squarely into the mid-engine era, both at Sarthe and on the road.  So you're looking for a bit of that Alfa 33/Ferrari P4 sensation for the street?  Look no further, this is where it starts.  Bertone gave real sports car styling to their replacement for the 850 Spider, and the idea of placing the Fiat 128's driveline behind the seats gave impressive handling.  The X1/9 sports struts and disk brakes at all four corners and a 1.3 liter SOHC engine attached to a four-speed gearbox.   All I can say is "good luck."  fewer than 1800 Lancia Scorpions were ever imported into the US, and the ones that made it here are either highly prized, or badly neglected.  The car's biggest failing in stock form is being slow, very slow.  Oh don't get me wrong, on a twisty road, the Scorpion (Montecarlo in Europe) can more than hold its own due to its wonderful handling.  It will also hold its own in any parking lot because Pininfarina made sure it looked as spectacular as any super car.  The chassis was an evolution of that seen on the Fiat X1/9, and the gearbox gave five speeds.  In europe, the Montecarlo got a 2.0 liter Lampredi twin-cam that, at 120BHP, gave just about enough power.  But in the US, the Scorpion came with probably the most smog-neutered 1.8 liter version of the same motor giving 86BHP.
  All I can say is "good luck."  fewer than 1800 Lancia Scorpions were ever imported into the US, and the ones that made it here are either highly prized, or badly neglected.  The car's biggest failing in stock form is being slow, very slow.  Oh don't get me wrong, on a twisty road, the Scorpion (Montecarlo in Europe) can more than hold its own due to its wonderful handling.  It will also hold its own in any parking lot because Pininfarina made sure it looked as spectacular as any super car.  The chassis was an evolution of that seen on the Fiat X1/9, and the gearbox gave five speeds.  In europe, the Montecarlo got a 2.0 liter Lampredi twin-cam that, at 120BHP, gave just about enough power.  But in the US, the Scorpion came with probably the most smog-neutered 1.8 liter version of the same motor giving 86BHP.   I'm not looking to start a fight here, really.  I know this doesn't look like a car that will give much of an endurance racing feel, but I think I'm on to something here.  the one real ace in the hole for the XJ-S is price.  they can be found running for under $1,500.  I say "running" but really that means the car will turn over, and maybe get down the block before the expensive V12 throws another fit and you have to tow it to a specialist.  But did you catch the key point there?  For 1.5K you get a V12!  Some of the coolest cars to race at Le Mans from Lagondas to Ferraris have done so with twelve cylinders.  And of course, this V12 was one of them, starting with Group 44 and the XJR-5, through to TWR and the XJR-12.
I'm not looking to start a fight here, really.  I know this doesn't look like a car that will give much of an endurance racing feel, but I think I'm on to something here.  the one real ace in the hole for the XJ-S is price.  they can be found running for under $1,500.  I say "running" but really that means the car will turn over, and maybe get down the block before the expensive V12 throws another fit and you have to tow it to a specialist.  But did you catch the key point there?  For 1.5K you get a V12!  Some of the coolest cars to race at Le Mans from Lagondas to Ferraris have done so with twelve cylinders.  And of course, this V12 was one of them, starting with Group 44 and the XJR-5, through to TWR and the XJR-12. Ok, we're back to proper sports cars, and this is another one that actually raced at Le Mans in the 80s.  Better yet, the RX7 boasts a very real link to the Mazda 787B, a car famous to players of Grand Turismo 4 as the only Japanese car, and the only rotary powered car ever to win Le Mans outright.  I've gone for the first generation car, though at this point, the MkII car may be cheaper.  Faster too, especially the turbo, which is still an astoundingly cheap sports car.
  Ok, we're back to proper sports cars, and this is another one that actually raced at Le Mans in the 80s.  Better yet, the RX7 boasts a very real link to the Mazda 787B, a car famous to players of Grand Turismo 4 as the only Japanese car, and the only rotary powered car ever to win Le Mans outright.  I've gone for the first generation car, though at this point, the MkII car may be cheaper.  Faster too, especially the turbo, which is still an astoundingly cheap sports car.   Whether it's one of Ferrari's 365 GTB/4 Daytona Competiziones, or the later 575 GTCs, or even Alfa's own 8C 2.9 Le Mans Berlinetta, the Italians have a long history of racing GTs with a big front engine and a transaxle gearbox.  The GTV-6 is absolutely the cheapest way to get into such a car for the road.
Whether it's one of Ferrari's 365 GTB/4 Daytona Competiziones, or the later 575 GTCs, or even Alfa's own 8C 2.9 Le Mans Berlinetta, the Italians have a long history of racing GTs with a big front engine and a transaxle gearbox.  The GTV-6 is absolutely the cheapest way to get into such a car for the road.   Toyota's first real attempt at a sports car since 1967's super elegant, super expensive 2000 GT was a total success.  This may be the fastest overall car on the list with a stiff structure, disk brakes, independent suspension by MacPherson-struts, and a mid-mounted, twin-cam, 16 valve 1.6 liter engine.  115BP may not sound like much, but this is one of the best handling cars money could buy in the 1980s, and the car weighs about 2200LBS.
Toyota's first real attempt at a sports car since 1967's super elegant, super expensive 2000 GT was a total success.  This may be the fastest overall car on the list with a stiff structure, disk brakes, independent suspension by MacPherson-struts, and a mid-mounted, twin-cam, 16 valve 1.6 liter engine.  115BP may not sound like much, but this is one of the best handling cars money could buy in the 1980s, and the car weighs about 2200LBS.   I know, I know, it's not a very manly car.  Get over yourself!  This is nothing less than the sports car that re-ignited sports cars, and it's one of the best there is.  It may not look very racy, but underneath Mazda's engineers had done their job; the Miata was great right from the start.  Great engine: a 1.6 liter DOHC 16 valve with 118BHP and a valve cover than looks like a classic Lotus.  Great chassis:  2,100Lb weight thanks partly to an aluminum hood, double-wishbones and disk-brakes at all four corners.  Great shifter, smooth, direct steering, great seats... the list goes on.
I know, I know, it's not a very manly car.  Get over yourself!  This is nothing less than the sports car that re-ignited sports cars, and it's one of the best there is.  It may not look very racy, but underneath Mazda's engineers had done their job; the Miata was great right from the start.  Great engine: a 1.6 liter DOHC 16 valve with 118BHP and a valve cover than looks like a classic Lotus.  Great chassis:  2,100Lb weight thanks partly to an aluminum hood, double-wishbones and disk-brakes at all four corners.  Great shifter, smooth, direct steering, great seats... the list goes on.